Lately, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made impressive strides, and its applications have spread to quite a lot of industries, including healthcare, banking, transportation, and environmental preservation. Nevertheless, as using AI spreads, worries about its effects on the environment have surfaced, notably in relation to the energy needed to run and train AI models and the resulting greenhouse gas emissions. Some of the potent AI systems in use today, GPT-3, for example, produces emissions during training which are comparable to those created by five cars over the course of their lifespan.

The environmental effects of diverse AI systems have been examined in a recent study, with a give attention to their capability to perform tasks like writing and painting. A team of researchers has compared the emissions created by various AI systems, namely ChatGPT, BLOOM, DALL-E2, and Midjourney, with the emissions produced by humans when carrying out the identical duties. Writing text and producing images are the 2 common tasks which were highlighted.

The goal is to contrast the environmental impact of individuals performing these tasks with that of AI. The team has emphasized the interchangeability of humans and AI by demonstrating that these costs are typically lower than those paid when humans perform similar activities, notwithstanding the environmental costs related to AI. The outcomes have shown a startling discrepancy on the subject of creating words.

When making a page of text, AI systems produce between 130 and 1500 times less carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) than a human would. This significant difference highlights the environmental benefits of AI in this case. Just like this, AI systems release 310 to 2900 times less CO2e than humans do when creating images. These numbers unequivocally show how much less emissions are produced when images are created using AI.

The team has shared that it’s crucial to acknowledge that an emissions study by itself cannot provide a full picture as various necessary social repercussions and aspects must be taken under consideration, that are as follows –

1. Skilled Displacement: In some industries, employment displacement may result from using AI to undertake jobs that humans have historically handled. It is necessary to properly handle this displacement’s potential economic and social effects.

2. Legality: It’s crucial to make sure AI systems are developed and utilized in keeping with moral and legal principles. The legality of AI-generated content and its potential abuse should be addressed to avoid any harm.

3. Rebound Effects: When AI is introduced into different industries, it can have unanticipated implications which are known as rebound effects. These results could show up as higher use or production.

It’s critical to grasp that not all human functions will be replaced by AI. AI cannot do some tasks and positions that decision for human creativity, empathy, and decision-making. Nevertheless, the present research indicates that, in comparison with humans, AI has the potential to drastically reduce emissions in quite a lot of tasks. While these results are encouraging from an environmental perspective, they need even be taken under consideration within the context of more extensive ethical, economic, and societal aspects to be certain that AI integration is consistent with shared objectives and values. The prospect of using AI to finish some tasks with significantly fewer emissions is a viable approach to solving current environmental problems.

Take a look at the Paper. All Credit For This Research Goes To the Researchers on This Project. Also, don’t forget to affix our 30k+ ML SubReddit, 40k+ Facebook Community, Discord Channel, and Email Newsletter, where we share the most recent AI research news, cool AI projects, and more.

In case you like our work, you’ll love our newsletter..