Ever been anxious about being called out for mistakes in your evaluation? You’re not alone.
Producing a faulty evaluation and guiding my organization within the flawed direction based on my results has been considered one of my biggest fears since starting out as an analyst. And to be honest, being exposed and called out on my mess much more so.
My nightmare scenario: A serious feature my team has worked on for months, based on my suggestion, fails to deliver value during testing. People start asking questions, and after investigating, it becomes clear that my assumptions were based on incorrect evaluation results.
Having spoken to and mentored many analysts since then, I’ve learned that I’m removed from the just one who feels this fashion. Quite the opposite, it is a quite common fear that many analysts share.
The the reason why one can feel anxious about an evaluation are quite obvious: publishing and promoting flawed results and suggestions affects each the organization as a complete and at the identical time poses risks for us personally.
Despite these risks, avoiding sharing analyses or shying away from controversial or assumption-challenging results will not be the fitting approach. Actually, these analyses are sometimes an important. As a substitute, it’s crucial to develop strategies that help mitigate the chance of manufacturing flawed outputs. And this starts with appreciating the next:
Making mistakes as an Analyst is freaking easy.
Analysts work in a really complex environment with a high degree of freedom, so there are lots of opportunities to make a mistake or draw flawed conclusions.
Conducting an evaluation involves several different steps:
- Defining the research query and approach
- Collecting and cleansing the info
- Analyzing and interpreting the info
- Visualizing and communicating the outcomes
At each stage, it’s fairly easy to make a mistake which is able to ultimately be reflected in our recommendations and the…